Skip to main content

5 Thoughts on Issue 1

I have been mostly trying to avoid thinking or posting about politics lately.  Let's just say I was really jaded by the vitriol and propaganda from both sides during the COVID years.  However, a special election in August with only one issue on the ballot was enough to peak my interest, so I've been doing my due diligence and mulling over Issue 1.  Here are 5 thoughts on Issue 1.

Firstly, my initial reaction when reading the actual language of the proposed amendment was Meh.  As voracious as both sides have been, this issue is hardly as black and white as they're making it to be.  I am leaning a certain way, but I can see the validity to both sides of the debate.

Secondly, the fact that Progressives really, really want me to vote No makes we want to vote Yes.  I generally avoid defining myself by what I oppose, but occasionally the most convincing argument in favor of a proposition is the people who are threatened by it.  In fact, before I knew anything at all about Issue 1, I assumed I would want to support it simply because of the vehemence with which several of my Progressive friends were opposing it.

Thirdly, I don't think I've ever seen such a convoluted campaign over an Issue.  The Progressives have been using sensational language designed to scare and manipulate.  The Conservatives have been little, if any, better.  Neither side seems to want to discuss the actual political merits of Issue 1.  It is proper to consider the potential impact of a proposed political idea, but when our vote is purely motivated by the "what ifs" of an Issue, we probably aren't thinking straight about the propriety and wisdom of the idea itself. 

Fourthly, the Liberal slogan One Person, One Vote perfectly illustrates the civic illiteracy of the populace.  We do not believe in pure Democracy, either in Ohio or in the United States.  We believe in electing representatives who legislate on our behalf.  We do not believe in mob rule.  Mobs are too easy to rile with inflammatory rhetoric.

Fifthly and finally, Issue 1 is the height of political irony, a fact which seems lost on both sides.  You see, Issue 1 is, in fact, a proposed amendment to the Constitution of our fair State.  The Conservatives don't think you should be able to change our Constitution through a simple popular majority, so they're attempting to change the Constitution through a simple popular majority.  The Progressives think we need to preserve the right of a simple popular majority to decide major issues in our State, but they don't want to let a simple popular majority decide this major issue.

Somebody cue the Alanis.

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...
Post a Comment
Read more

Anglicanism, Paedocommunion, & Being Reformed

I consider myself Reformed.  I was baptized as a baby in a PCA church.  I grew up in a Reformed microdenomination that allowed its member churches to subscribe to any of the Reformed confessions (we subscribed to the Three Forms of Unity).  In many ways, whether I like it or not, I still think and act like a Reformed Presbyterian.   Some, however, would seek to deny me that label.  I suspect there are many reasons for this, but paramount among them is that I hold to Paedocommunion (hereafter PC), which, for some reason, is absolutely the worst thing ever to these people.  Some would go so far as to say that PC makes me a heretic, but they all agree that I am certainly not Reformed .   My recent engagement with these opponents of PC has caused me to reflect on what it means to be Reformed and what it means to be a Christian.  This online jousting has dovetailed well with some of my recent study, particularly  An Apology of the Church...
Post a Comment
Read more

Some Thoughts on the 2024 Election

So, we had an election earlier this week.  Perhaps you heard about it. I have done my best to remain mostly silent on political issues this time around because I have found that fixating on such matters does little for my mental or spiritual health.  Also, no one cares what I think.  Nevertheless, here are a few thoughts on our recent election. 1) I didn't vote for Donald Trump, but I'd be lying if I said I'm not glad he won.  To be clear, that says more about Kamala Harris than about Donald Trump. 2) This election seemed much cleaner--much less suspicious--than the sordid affair we had in 2020.  This election didn't feature any poll workers tallying (discovering? conjuring?) votes behind closed doors in the wee hours of the night, messy mail-in voting, or voter turnout beyond plausible expectations.  The 2020 election had me convinced that we would never see another peaceful, uncontested election, but, as contentious as things were this year, it seems like...
Post a Comment
Read more