Skip to main content

5 Thoughts on Issue 1

I have been mostly trying to avoid thinking or posting about politics lately.  Let's just say I was really jaded by the vitriol and propaganda from both sides during the COVID years.  However, a special election in August with only one issue on the ballot was enough to peak my interest, so I've been doing my due diligence and mulling over Issue 1.  Here are 5 thoughts on Issue 1.

Firstly, my initial reaction when reading the actual language of the proposed amendment was Meh.  As voracious as both sides have been, this issue is hardly as black and white as they're making it to be.  I am leaning a certain way, but I can see the validity to both sides of the debate.

Secondly, the fact that Progressives really, really want me to vote No makes we want to vote Yes.  I generally avoid defining myself by what I oppose, but occasionally the most convincing argument in favor of a proposition is the people who are threatened by it.  In fact, before I knew anything at all about Issue 1, I assumed I would want to support it simply because of the vehemence with which several of my Progressive friends were opposing it.

Thirdly, I don't think I've ever seen such a convoluted campaign over an Issue.  The Progressives have been using sensational language designed to scare and manipulate.  The Conservatives have been little, if any, better.  Neither side seems to want to discuss the actual political merits of Issue 1.  It is proper to consider the potential impact of a proposed political idea, but when our vote is purely motivated by the "what ifs" of an Issue, we probably aren't thinking straight about the propriety and wisdom of the idea itself. 

Fourthly, the Liberal slogan One Person, One Vote perfectly illustrates the civic illiteracy of the populace.  We do not believe in pure Democracy, either in Ohio or in the United States.  We believe in electing representatives who legislate on our behalf.  We do not believe in mob rule.  Mobs are too easy to rile with inflammatory rhetoric.

Fifthly and finally, Issue 1 is the height of political irony, a fact which seems lost on both sides.  You see, Issue 1 is, in fact, a proposed amendment to the Constitution of our fair State.  The Conservatives don't think you should be able to change our Constitution through a simple popular majority, so they're attempting to change the Constitution through a simple popular majority.  The Progressives think we need to preserve the right of a simple popular majority to decide major issues in our State, but they don't want to let a simple popular majority decide this major issue.

Somebody cue the Alanis.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Forgive Them"

“Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” Forgiveness is hard.  Forgiveness is really, really hard. It’s difficult to forgive others who have genuinely harmed or offended us.   It’s easy to say , “I forgive you,” but it’s extremely difficult to feel it–to make peace in our hearts with the injustices that others have perpetrated against us. It just doesn’t feel right.  Sin should be punished!  Wrongs should be righted!  Right?! It’s difficult to forgive others when they ask for it.  It’s even more difficult to forgive them when they haven’t asked for it–when they don’t even recognize what they’ve done to hurt us. As our Savior hung upon His Cross, He asked the Father to forgive those nearby–those who were unwittingly contributing to the greatest injustice in the history of the world. These thieves, soldiers, and standers-by had no idea what was happening.  They had no idea that the jealousy of the Jews had placed Christ on that Cross...
Post a Comment
Read more

5 Reasons I Want my Wife to Start Wearing a Head Covering during Corporate Worship

    Of late, the issue of head coverings has come up in my circle.  Okay...my cousin and I have been discussing it, but the point is, the issue has been bouncing around my head for the past few days.  It is a topic that I have avoided for some time.  Every time I read through 1 Corinthians, I would tell myself, "We'll get around to that."  The reality is that I didn't want to be "that guy"...that guy who people view as a chauvinistic jerk who wants to make sure everyone--especially his wife--remembers that he's the head of his home.  I think I'm beginning to respect "that guy"--those men who have cared enough to stand for what they believe.     Let me be clear that I am referring to head coverings for women (those old enough to leave them on...)  DURING CORPORATE WORSHIP.  I am not advocating head coverings at all times.  Though I see nothing necessarily wrong that practice, I don't see any command for it either.   ...
15 comments
Read more

Paedocommunion: Consistent Covenantalism or Anti-Confessionalism?

    Being raised as a paedocommunionist (that means our kids get to eat Jesus, too), I have always been amazed by how passionately credocommunionists (that means their kids don't get to eat Jesus until they articulate a "credible" profession of faith) dislike the practice.  I would think that they could look at paedocommunion and at least respect it as an attempt to live out Covenant Theology in a consistent way.  Instead, paedocommunionists have been widely viewed as being on the fringe of the fringe (yes, that far) of Reformed Theology.  I like to think that I have been able to agree-to-disagree in an amicable way with my credocommunionist friends.  However, I will admit that being discounted as "unconfessional" (trust me, I've been called worse) has made many paedocommunionists (you'd have to ask my friends whether or not that applies to me) act in a manner that lacks Christian grace.     So, the question remains, is paedocommunion a view hel...
4 comments
Read more