Skip to main content

Orthodoxy

The older I get, the more I lean into orthodoxy.  As a general rule, I am wary when I hear the terms cutting-edge, novel, groundbreaking, or progressive applied to theology.

Orthodoxy is objective.  

Orthodoxy is bigger than me.  

Orthodoxy is a standard outside of myself--my weaknesses, my blind spots, my biases--to which my theology conforms.

Orthodoxy is stable.

Orthodoxy is an anchor that keeps us from this tossing about with every wave of doctrine

Theology has an unfortunate tendency to adapt, both to the culture around us and to the storm within us.  We too often import current cultural values into Christianity because we don't want to be out of touch or old-fashioned.  We also allow our personal experiences--triumphs and failures, successes and hardships--to color the way we view God and interpret His Word.  

We believe what we want to believe.

We are masters of self-deception--we can convince ourselves of anything.  Our reason follows after our desires like a puppy dog follows its owner or a teenage boy follows a pretty girl.

Orthodoxy keeps us from riding the pendulum back and forth.

Orthodoxy helps us to avoid allowing valid concerns--poor theology or spiritual abuses--to lead us to invalid theological reorientations.  

Orthodoxy frees us from slavery to upheaval.

The message of the Gospel demands to be applied to our unique cultural and personal settings, but the message itself must remain the same.  

Orthodoxy ensures that the core of the Gospel, however variously it may be applied in any given context, remains undistorted by my personal whims.

Orthodoxy is restful.

Orthodoxy is emboldening.

Orthodoxy is beautiful.

Hold fast, my brethren.  Hold fast to orthodoxy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary