Skip to main content

Orthodoxy

The older I get, the more I lean into orthodoxy.  As a general rule, I am wary when I hear the terms cutting-edge, novel, groundbreaking, or progressive applied to theology.

Orthodoxy is objective.  

Orthodoxy is bigger than me.  

Orthodoxy is a standard outside of myself--my weaknesses, my blind spots, my biases--to which my theology conforms.

Orthodoxy is stable.

Orthodoxy is an anchor that keeps us from this tossing about with every wave of doctrine

Theology has an unfortunate tendency to adapt, both to the culture around us and to the storm within us.  We too often import current cultural values into Christianity because we don't want to be out of touch or old-fashioned.  We also allow our personal experiences--triumphs and failures, successes and hardships--to color the way we view God and interpret His Word.  

We believe what we want to believe.

We are masters of self-deception--we can convince ourselves of anything.  Our reason follows after our desires like a puppy dog follows its owner or a teenage boy follows a pretty girl.

Orthodoxy keeps us from riding the pendulum back and forth.

Orthodoxy helps us to avoid allowing valid concerns--poor theology or spiritual abuses--to lead us to invalid theological reorientations.  

Orthodoxy frees us from slavery to upheaval.

The message of the Gospel demands to be applied to our unique cultural and personal settings, but the message itself must remain the same.  

Orthodoxy ensures that the core of the Gospel, however variously it may be applied in any given context, remains undistorted by my personal whims.

Orthodoxy is restful.

Orthodoxy is emboldening.

Orthodoxy is beautiful.

Hold fast, my brethren.  Hold fast to orthodoxy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...

Anglicanism, Paedocommunion, & Being Reformed

I consider myself Reformed.  I was baptized as a baby in a PCA church.  I grew up in a Reformed microdenomination that allowed its member churches to subscribe to any of the Reformed confessions (we subscribed to the Three Forms of Unity).  In many ways, whether I like it or not, I still think and act like a Reformed Presbyterian.   Some, however, would seek to deny me that label.  I suspect there are many reasons for this, but paramount among them is that I hold to Paedocommunion (hereafter PC), which, for some reason, is absolutely the worst thing ever to these people.  Some would go so far as to say that PC makes me a heretic, but they all agree that I am certainly not Reformed .   My recent engagement with these opponents of PC has caused me to reflect on what it means to be Reformed and what it means to be a Christian.  This online jousting has dovetailed well with some of my recent study, particularly  An Apology of the Church...