Skip to main content

Mass Shootings: Root & Branch

Whenever a mass shooting occurs, especially at a school, two questions go through my head:

1) What kind of prescription medication was the shooter taking?

2) What kind of family life did the shooter have?

It seems like the majority of time I can answer these questions without bothering to read the coverage.

Firearms are, fundamentally speaking, tools.  Tools do their masters' bidding, enabling those who wield them effectively to accomplish their goals or ends more efficiently.  These goals can be productive (building houses, preparing food, etc.) or destructive (theft, murder, etc.).  Throughout history firearms have been used for many productive purposes, especially hunting and self-defense (individually and nationally).

This concept is not difficult to understand.  We all recognize it in our daily lives.  Many medicines and supplements are poisons if taken in excessive dosages, many household products can be deadly if not used carefully, many machines in factories can lead to injury or death, and so on and so forth.  

Inanimate objects are what we make of them.  

The problem, then, is not the tool, but the design or goal in the heart or mind of the individual wielding the tool.  Subsequently, the solution must address the actual problem that lies behind the act, not an incidental tool used in the act.  Treating symptoms will never heal the disease.  In other words, the answer to preventing mass murder will never be banning a tool.  If you remove one tool from the hands of the criminal hell-bent on bloodshed, another tool will take its place.  Evil men will stop at nothing to accomplish their goals, and firearms are far from the only tool available to effect the goal of mass casualties (remember the OKC bombing?).

This leads us back to where we started.  What factors seem to connect all these mass murders?  If we investigate those factors and work to remediate them, perhaps we will find some success in eliminating the end result to which they lead.

Except, maybe we can't.  Maybe we can't because we don't really want to.  Maybe as a culture we are not willing to make the changes required to address the real problem.  

We'd rather medicate, legislate, and fornicate.

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...
Post a Comment
Read more

Anglicanism, Paedocommunion, & Being Reformed

I consider myself Reformed.  I was baptized as a baby in a PCA church.  I grew up in a Reformed microdenomination that allowed its member churches to subscribe to any of the Reformed confessions (we subscribed to the Three Forms of Unity).  In many ways, whether I like it or not, I still think and act like a Reformed Presbyterian.   Some, however, would seek to deny me that label.  I suspect there are many reasons for this, but paramount among them is that I hold to Paedocommunion (hereafter PC), which, for some reason, is absolutely the worst thing ever to these people.  Some would go so far as to say that PC makes me a heretic, but they all agree that I am certainly not Reformed .   My recent engagement with these opponents of PC has caused me to reflect on what it means to be Reformed and what it means to be a Christian.  This online jousting has dovetailed well with some of my recent study, particularly  An Apology of the Church...
Post a Comment
Read more

Some Thoughts on the 2024 Election

So, we had an election earlier this week.  Perhaps you heard about it. I have done my best to remain mostly silent on political issues this time around because I have found that fixating on such matters does little for my mental or spiritual health.  Also, no one cares what I think.  Nevertheless, here are a few thoughts on our recent election. 1) I didn't vote for Donald Trump, but I'd be lying if I said I'm not glad he won.  To be clear, that says more about Kamala Harris than about Donald Trump. 2) This election seemed much cleaner--much less suspicious--than the sordid affair we had in 2020.  This election didn't feature any poll workers tallying (discovering? conjuring?) votes behind closed doors in the wee hours of the night, messy mail-in voting, or voter turnout beyond plausible expectations.  The 2020 election had me convinced that we would never see another peaceful, uncontested election, but, as contentious as things were this year, it seems like...
Post a Comment
Read more