Skip to main content

Do the McMichaels Deserve a Fair Trial?

Let me ask you a question.  Do you believe that the McMichaels deserve a fair trial?

Think about your answer for a moment.

Now, allow me to rephrase it.

Do the McMichaels, human beings and citizens of the United States, deserve the presumption of innocence until proven guilty in a court of law?

If you say No, you are denying the most fundamental principle of our justice system.

Let me be clear.  I think it is likely that the McMichaels are guilty of a heinous crime.  I believe that they should be tried in a court of law, and, if convicted, be punished for that crime.

Again, let me be clear.  Public outcry was warranted.  They should have been (and now have been) charged and put on trial for their acts.

But they do deserve that trial.  They deserve to have their day in court.

Even war criminals get a trial.

Even serial killers get a trial.

Even terrorists get a trial.

Even the McMichaels deserve a trial.

And these trials are not mere formalities.  They are genuine, fair trials in a court of law.  This is a fundamental human right, and to deny that is to uproot many of the foundational principles of our nation. 

Public outcries have called for justice, and rightly so, but many of those voices seem to be skipping the trial and jumping straight to sentencing.  There is video evidence, and it appears to be damning, but that is not the whole story.  The video is never the whole story.  The video will be presented as part of the evidence in the trial, and the jury will make a decision.  That's how justice is supposed to work.

But justice is not being executed, right?  That's the whole problem, right?

Right, which is why we must call for justice, not another lynching.

We cannot procure justice by subverting it.  To lynch the McMichaels in the court of public opinion reduces us to their level.  To truncate the process of justice, presuming to know what happened that fateful day, makes us no better than the accused.  The answer to injustice is justice, not more injustice.  As the proverb goes, two wrongs don't make a right.  We cannot correct injustice by perpetrating more of it.

As Christians, justice should be a priority, both legal and social justice.  We should be shocked and appalled at the historic treatment of our black brethren and we should call for all men to receive justice, regardless of the color of their skin.  This is why it has been distressing to see how many Christians have skipped the trial and have gone straight to condemning the McMichaels.  As we work for social justice, we must not ignore the basic tenets of legal justice.  A fair trial is not simply an American concept, but a Biblical one.  If we are insulted by the miscarriage of justice in this case, the answer is not to bypass justice and make public opinion the judge, jury, and executioner.  Presuming guilt is not the Christian thing to do.  If justice is what we want, then we must follow the legal process to justice.  If we are infuriated that the McMichaels took justice into their own hands, presuming Ahmaud's guilt because of the color of his skin, we must not respond by denying justice to them.

Do I think that they are guilty?  Sure.  Do I think that they deserve a fair trial?  Absolutely.  36 seconds of shaky video, as damning and disturbing as it is, isn't enough to incarcerate two men for the rest of their lives.  I wasn't there.  You weren't there.  There is more to the story.  The McMichaels deserve a fair trial in a court of law.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Forgive Them"

“Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” Forgiveness is hard.  Forgiveness is really, really hard. It’s difficult to forgive others who have genuinely harmed or offended us.   It’s easy to say , “I forgive you,” but it’s extremely difficult to feel it–to make peace in our hearts with the injustices that others have perpetrated against us. It just doesn’t feel right.  Sin should be punished!  Wrongs should be righted!  Right?! It’s difficult to forgive others when they ask for it.  It’s even more difficult to forgive them when they haven’t asked for it–when they don’t even recognize what they’ve done to hurt us. As our Savior hung upon His Cross, He asked the Father to forgive those nearby–those who were unwittingly contributing to the greatest injustice in the history of the world. These thieves, soldiers, and standers-by had no idea what was happening.  They had no idea that the jealousy of the Jews had placed Christ on that Cross...

5 Reasons I Want my Wife to Start Wearing a Head Covering during Corporate Worship

    Of late, the issue of head coverings has come up in my circle.  Okay...my cousin and I have been discussing it, but the point is, the issue has been bouncing around my head for the past few days.  It is a topic that I have avoided for some time.  Every time I read through 1 Corinthians, I would tell myself, "We'll get around to that."  The reality is that I didn't want to be "that guy"...that guy who people view as a chauvinistic jerk who wants to make sure everyone--especially his wife--remembers that he's the head of his home.  I think I'm beginning to respect "that guy"--those men who have cared enough to stand for what they believe.     Let me be clear that I am referring to head coverings for women (those old enough to leave them on...)  DURING CORPORATE WORSHIP.  I am not advocating head coverings at all times.  Though I see nothing necessarily wrong that practice, I don't see any command for it either.   ...

Paedocommunion: Consistent Covenantalism or Anti-Confessionalism?

    Being raised as a paedocommunionist (that means our kids get to eat Jesus, too), I have always been amazed by how passionately credocommunionists (that means their kids don't get to eat Jesus until they articulate a "credible" profession of faith) dislike the practice.  I would think that they could look at paedocommunion and at least respect it as an attempt to live out Covenant Theology in a consistent way.  Instead, paedocommunionists have been widely viewed as being on the fringe of the fringe (yes, that far) of Reformed Theology.  I like to think that I have been able to agree-to-disagree in an amicable way with my credocommunionist friends.  However, I will admit that being discounted as "unconfessional" (trust me, I've been called worse) has made many paedocommunionists (you'd have to ask my friends whether or not that applies to me) act in a manner that lacks Christian grace.     So, the question remains, is paedocommunion a view hel...