Skip to main content

COVID-19 & the Economy: A Spiritual Analysis

Unless you're living under a rock (which might not be such a bad thing right now), you're aware that a novel coronavirus, officially labelled COVID-19, has sent the world into a frenzy.  Major events have been cancelled, travel bans have been put implemented, and people are stocking up on toilet paper!  Beyond the obvious medical implications of a pandemic like this, people have begun to express concern over the economic impact it will have, especially as the stock market is diving precipitously.  The NBA shut down will itself cost untold millions, and it will affect not only the rich, but your average joe as well.  President Trump has urged Congress to pass legislation to support those put out of work due to COVID-19, but the government gets all of its money from taxpayers, so we're probably just delaying the economic implications. 

I am not a medical expert, nor am I an economic expert, so I really don't intend to comment on either of those fields.  In fact, I've done my best to ignore this issue since it hit the news.  I just wanted to share a couple of thoughts regarding the recent panic, especially regarding the economy. 

1) This is the danger of an entertainment-based economy.  As I listened to Trump speak about the Federal governments attempts to limit the economic impact of COVID-19, and as I saw complaints on Facebook about the economic impact of the NBA closing and the NCAA tournament being cancelled, I couldn't help but to be saddened by the fact that our economy is so fundamentally based upon entertainment.  For every sporting event, concert, or convention cancelled, dozens or hundreds of normal people are financially impacted.  I do not wish to impugn those people, and there is certainly nothing wrong with sports, music, film, etc., but it doesn't bode well for our future as a nation. 

Economically speaking, this is a tenuous situation.  Certainly medical crises pose risks to entertainment-based economies, but so do regular economic downturns.  When there is less disposable income, spending on entertainment falls (hopefully).  To build so much of our nation's wealth on the unsteady foundation of entertainment is surely untenable long-term.  Every time I hear about a football player or a baseball player (especially a baseball player) getting an enormous contract, I think, "How is this sustainable?"  How long can this house of cards stand?

Economic experts have long divided labor into two categories: productive and unproductive.  Some activities are inherently productive because they increase the general wealth of a nation, while other jobs simply transfer wealth back and forth, accomplishing nothing more, nationally speaking, than to circulate money between individuals.  This is not to say that there is anything immoral or unnecessary about unproductive forms of labor (many important and perfectly valid employments are economically unproductive, technically speaking), but an economy that is overwhelmingly comprised of unproductive labor will eventually fall into decline.  Economic experts argue over what kinds of labor should fall into which of these two categories, but I think most would agree that, generally speaking, money spent on entertainment is not the most productive investment of capital.  Sure, that capital can subsequently be invested in more productive forms of wealth, but it certainly loses potential for creating wealth.  

2) What are our priorities?  As one quietly observes the cesspool of human interaction (social media), it is easy to get depressed, especially in times of crisis.  Many people suddenly become experts on issues they have never studied.  Others prefer to deal with crisis through dark humor, often mocking the pain and suffering that others are experiencing.  Through all of the ups and downs of social media, people reveal their true selves.  They reveal their priorities.  This crisis has demonstrated that for many Americans, their priorities are money and entertainment.

When someone's primary concern amidst a crisis (genuine or contrived) is how the economy is going to be affected, I think it is valid to question that person's priorities.  It is not wrong to study or to be concerned about economics, but there are vastly more important things than the state of our economy.  Beyond spiritual matters, human life is itself more important than economic prosperity.  Let me say this clearly: human life is more important than money.  Of course, economic prosperity can be a blessing and leads to greater sustenance of human life, but I don't believe that that is why people are so unsettled.  I think many people are more worried about losing their lifestyle than their lives.

This situation reminds me of the 2016 Presidential race.  Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton were neck-and-neck and so many people were lamenting the idea of voting for Trump.  They did so, however, because they feared the economic implications of four years under Hillary.  I respect every man's right to vote his conscience, but I was saddened that economic prosperity was the highest priority for so many Christians.  Our Savior said, "For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also," and those words are as true today as they have ever been.  It is in moments like these that people reveal where their treasures lie, and I'm afraid that many Americans, Christian and non, are loudly proclaiming that economic prosperity is the most important thing in their world. 

As American Christians, we should reevaluate our priorities constantly.  There is nothing wrong with physical wealth, but we must examine whether or not our wealth has become an idol.  Do we own our stuff, or does it own us?  Are we prepared to live in economically disastrous times?  Are we ready to be uncomfortable?  Could our faith survive a Holocaust or a Great Depression?  If we're honest, I don't think we'd like our answers to these questions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary