Skip to main content

3 Reasons Why the Democrats Should Not Nominate Bernie Sanders; or 3 Reasons Why the Republicans Should Hope the Democrats Nominate Bernie Sanders

It's that time again!  It's that abysmal season when you can't stand anyone on Facebook and you can't avoid attack ads on TV and radio!  It's election season!

This time around it's the Democrat's turn to put their best man or woman forward in an effort to unseat the Republican incumbent, Donald Trump.  Trump's tenure has been tumultuous, to put it mildly, but at least it's been entertaining!  The Democratic candidates are all framing their campaigns around one goal--defeating Trump.  Surging towards the front of the pack is the Senator from Vermont, Bernie Sanders.  Despite, or perhaps because of, his idiosyncrasies, Sanders has gained notoriety, particularly winning the hearts of our nation's youth, and posing a viable threat to the status quo in the Democratic party.

I am not a Democrat (nor am I a Republican), but I would like to offer them some advice, especially the young voters.  Don't do it!  Do not nominate Bernie Sanders.  "Why?" you ask (or maybe you didn't).  Well, here's why.

1) He's full Commie.  I know, I know.  He's a Democratic Socialist.  That is entirely different, we are told.  He's not a socialist or a communist or a fascist.  Those are all mean words people use to discredit him, they say.  Bernie Sanders is a man of the people!  Let me tell you something, kids.  Semantics is a political tool and Democratic Socialist is just a palatable way to say Commie. 

'Murica!

Seriously though, nobody starts out as a full-blown Commie.  Nobody starts out as an avowed Fascist.  Socialism and Communism, no matter the iteration, naturally lead to fascism, as demonstrated by the history that our public education system in America (itself fundamentally Socialistic) failed to (or rather intended not to) teach you.

Adolph Hitler.  Joseph Stalin.  Benito Mussolini.  Look up those names.  Study their lives, their beliefs, and their history-altering actions.  They were all Socialists.  None of those men rose to power by saying that they were going to kill millions of people and strip their citizens of their inalienable rights.  They called for equality and fairness.  They championed social justice and fomented class warfare.

Bernie Sanders is hiding behind the term Democratic Socialist, but he has not hidden his agenda.  He intends to alter the economic, political, and cultural landscape of this nation in a fundamental way.  I believe he is genuine, or at least he was at one time.  That is what makes him so dangerous.  He is religiously progressive.  He believes that the basic tenets of Americanism, our prized ideals of individual liberty, private property, etc. are evils that need to be corrected.  You'd think that a Polish Jew, someone whose family was directly impacted by the Nazis in WW2, would know the evils of Socialism and her sister philosophies, but some people refuse to learn from history.

Bernie Sanders is full Commie.  Never go full Commie.

2) He's economically illiterate.  If you have no problem with Sanders' radical political ideologies, perhaps you will consider how disastrous his economic policies would be.  If you've watched any of the debates, you should know that Bernie Sanders is unfamiliar with the basic concepts of economics.  A career politician who is now a millionaire, he lives in an artificial world where consequences for economic decisions are rare. 

There are two fundamental economic principles of which Bernie Sanders is ignorant (or which he willfully ignores).  The first is that resources are scarce.  Time, energy, money, etc. are all limited.  There simply isn't enough of everything in the world to provide everything that everybody wants.  That's the real world and we simply have to deal with it.  The study of economics aims to discern how to utilize our limited resources in the most efficient way.  Certainly there are ethical concerns to consider, but economics is fundamentally about how to use the resources we have efficiently.  When we use our resources efficiently, both as individuals and as a nation, we prosper, which is why free market capitalism is the true path to distributing wealth fairly.  This is the fundamental flaw of Socialism, economically speaking.  Big government can never lead to prosperity because big government is inherently inefficient.  Bernie Sanders just keeps on making promises to give people free stuff, but, as the old saying goes, there's no such thing as a free lunch.  His economic policies are only plausible in a fantasy world.

The second economic principle that Bernie Sanders ignores is that it takes money (capital) to make money (profit).  He talks about taxing the rich to pay for his programs, but what happens when he taxes rich people out of existence?  History demonstrates that raising tax rates often reduces overall tax revenue, so not only will Bernie's spending policies cost us money, but his taxing policies will reduce the revenue he intends to use to pay for his expensive programs.

This principle is particularly true when you tax those people who have demonstrated a proficiency in handling money.  Removing money from the hands of those who use it most productively doesn't just hurt the upper classes; it hurts everyone.  Prosperity is not a zero-sum game.  In other words, financial transactions do not have to have a winner and a loser.  When entrepreneurs create products and develop new ideas, everyone wins!  When the free market allows us to purchase what we want from whom we want, our economy is efficient and everybody benefits.  When you remove the capital necessary to develop new products and ideas, everybody suffers.  This is not a theoretical exercise.  Look no further than 20th century Europe and you will see that punishing ambition is one of the fastest ways to destroy an economy.

Bernie Sanders' economic policies would be nothing short of disastrous.  When CNN thinks your economic policies are too far to the left, you know you have a problem!

3) He'll never win.  I could be wrong, but I don't think that America is quite ready for Bernie Sanders (I hope and pray that we never are).  Heck, even the Democratic elites aren't ready for Bernie, which is why they blackballed him the first time around.  He's the Ron Paul of the Democratic party.  Ron Paul was the one true conservative in a field of moderate Republicans, and nobody would support him.  He was the one candidate who wanted to return the Republican party to her moors of fiscal responsibility and liberty, so his own party silenced him.  I think Bernie Sanders will suffer the same fate.

Moreover, even if Bernie does win the nomination, I think he will lose the general election, and it won't even be close.  If you thought that the Boomers came out to vote against Hillary, wait until you see how they come out to vote against a Commie!  Again, I could be wrong.  Maybe people hate Trump enough to cast their vote for a candidate who is an avowed Socialist.  Maybe Trump has paved the way for Sanders' ascent in the same way that Hillary made Trump possible.  Americans are chronically over-reactionary, so anything is possible, I but wholeheartedly believe that Trump's campaign would capitalize (pun intended) on Sanders' sketchy past and his radical agenda to scare voters away from Sanders.

Bernie Sanders winning the Democratic nomination would be bad for Democrats.  Bernie Sanders winning the general election would be bad for everyone.  The only person who would benefit is Bernie Sanders.

Behold, Socialism.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Forgive Them"

“Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” Forgiveness is hard.  Forgiveness is really, really hard. It’s difficult to forgive others who have genuinely harmed or offended us.   It’s easy to say , “I forgive you,” but it’s extremely difficult to feel it–to make peace in our hearts with the injustices that others have perpetrated against us. It just doesn’t feel right.  Sin should be punished!  Wrongs should be righted!  Right?! It’s difficult to forgive others when they ask for it.  It’s even more difficult to forgive them when they haven’t asked for it–when they don’t even recognize what they’ve done to hurt us. As our Savior hung upon His Cross, He asked the Father to forgive those nearby–those who were unwittingly contributing to the greatest injustice in the history of the world. These thieves, soldiers, and standers-by had no idea what was happening.  They had no idea that the jealousy of the Jews had placed Christ on that Cross...

5 Reasons I Want my Wife to Start Wearing a Head Covering during Corporate Worship

    Of late, the issue of head coverings has come up in my circle.  Okay...my cousin and I have been discussing it, but the point is, the issue has been bouncing around my head for the past few days.  It is a topic that I have avoided for some time.  Every time I read through 1 Corinthians, I would tell myself, "We'll get around to that."  The reality is that I didn't want to be "that guy"...that guy who people view as a chauvinistic jerk who wants to make sure everyone--especially his wife--remembers that he's the head of his home.  I think I'm beginning to respect "that guy"--those men who have cared enough to stand for what they believe.     Let me be clear that I am referring to head coverings for women (those old enough to leave them on...)  DURING CORPORATE WORSHIP.  I am not advocating head coverings at all times.  Though I see nothing necessarily wrong that practice, I don't see any command for it either.   ...

Paedocommunion: Consistent Covenantalism or Anti-Confessionalism?

    Being raised as a paedocommunionist (that means our kids get to eat Jesus, too), I have always been amazed by how passionately credocommunionists (that means their kids don't get to eat Jesus until they articulate a "credible" profession of faith) dislike the practice.  I would think that they could look at paedocommunion and at least respect it as an attempt to live out Covenant Theology in a consistent way.  Instead, paedocommunionists have been widely viewed as being on the fringe of the fringe (yes, that far) of Reformed Theology.  I like to think that I have been able to agree-to-disagree in an amicable way with my credocommunionist friends.  However, I will admit that being discounted as "unconfessional" (trust me, I've been called worse) has made many paedocommunionists (you'd have to ask my friends whether or not that applies to me) act in a manner that lacks Christian grace.     So, the question remains, is paedocommunion a view hel...