Skip to main content

Who are You to Judge the Servant of Another?

Balance, my brothers.  Balance.

I find that most theological or ethical conundrums are solvable if we find the balance between extremes.

The modern social landscape is pervaded by subjectivism and emotionalism.  

"Only God can judge me!" we cry.  

"Don't judge me!" we insist.

Unfortunately, this kind of thinking has infiltrated the Church and can be heard from pulpits around the world.  Pastors no longer make definitive declarations of right and wrong, nor are they allowed to say anything negative.  They're not supposed to tell people how to live their lives.  To speak of sin is taboo.  Christian brethren are no longer willing to exhort or to be exhorted.

"Different strokes for different folks!" rules the day.

This is, undoubtedly, an unbiblical mindset.  The idea that true love ignores behavior that is perilous to a brother's soul is patently false.  Christians, as the body of Christ and coworkers in the Gospel, are to be willing to talk about sin.  We should be courageous enough to warn our brother about sin and humble enough to be warned about our own.  The Bible tells us to confess our sins to each other and to bear one another's burdens, and it even gives us a strategy for presenting a brother with his sin.

But...balance.

The Bible also says, "Who are you to pass judgment on the servant of another?  It is before his own master that he stands or falls."

You should be willing to engage other people about their sin, but you are not Jesus.  You are not God.  You are a member of the body, but you are not the Head!  You do not possess the authority to judge the souls of your brethren!  It may be your job to warn and to edify, but it is not your calling to occupy the great white throne!  You, even if you are in a position of spiritual authority, are a brother, not a lord.  

You are not your brother's master!

Furthermore, you do not have the right to impose your preferences upon your brethren.  You have no right to hold people to a standard that you have unilaterally erected.  Many people who claim to confront sin in their brethren are merely confronting violations of their own arbitrary rules.  Like Pharisees they crucify anyone who oversteps their fences, all the while the weightier matters of the law are ignored.

Attitude is key here.

One's interaction with others should, no, must, always be defined by humility, and this is particularly important when exhortation is involved.  If a brother approaches us with sin, we must humbly embrace that rebuke.  Even if our brother is mistaken, we should still retain humility.  If we find it necessary (in other words, we shouldn't always be looking for opportunities, but should be willing) to rebuke a brother for sin, we must approach him with humility, respect, and tact.  

And...

Let us never forget that "Love covers a multitude of sins."  That truth is so important that the Bible says it twice!  Sometimes you just need to let stuff go!

So, my brethren, let us strive for that delicate balance.  Let our love be honest and our rebukes be humble.  Let us seek that organic, spirit-filled unity that members of a body ought to have.  Let us strike that harmony of graces that our Savior commended and demonstrated while He walked this Earth. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repe...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...