Skip to main content

Who are You to Judge the Servant of Another?

Balance, my brothers.  Balance.

I find that most theological or ethical conundrums are solvable if we find the balance between extremes.

The modern social landscape is pervaded by subjectivism and emotionalism.  

"Only God can judge me!" we cry.  

"Don't judge me!" we insist.

Unfortunately, this kind of thinking has infiltrated the Church and can be heard from pulpits around the world.  Pastors no longer make definitive declarations of right and wrong, nor are they allowed to say anything negative.  They're not supposed to tell people how to live their lives.  To speak of sin is taboo.  Christian brethren are no longer willing to exhort or to be exhorted.

"Different strokes for different folks!" rules the day.

This is, undoubtedly, an unbiblical mindset.  The idea that true love ignores behavior that is perilous to a brother's soul is patently false.  Christians, as the body of Christ and coworkers in the Gospel, are to be willing to talk about sin.  We should be courageous enough to warn our brother about sin and humble enough to be warned about our own.  The Bible tells us to confess our sins to each other and to bear one another's burdens, and it even gives us a strategy for presenting a brother with his sin.

But...balance.

The Bible also says, "Who are you to pass judgment on the servant of another?  It is before his own master that he stands or falls."

You should be willing to engage other people about their sin, but you are not Jesus.  You are not God.  You are a member of the body, but you are not the Head!  You do not possess the authority to judge the souls of your brethren!  It may be your job to warn and to edify, but it is not your calling to occupy the great white throne!  You, even if you are in a position of spiritual authority, are a brother, not a lord.  

You are not your brother's master!

Furthermore, you do not have the right to impose your preferences upon your brethren.  You have no right to hold people to a standard that you have unilaterally erected.  Many people who claim to confront sin in their brethren are merely confronting violations of their own arbitrary rules.  Like Pharisees they crucify anyone who oversteps their fences, all the while the weightier matters of the law are ignored.

Attitude is key here.

One's interaction with others should, no, must, always be defined by humility, and this is particularly important when exhortation is involved.  If a brother approaches us with sin, we must humbly embrace that rebuke.  Even if our brother is mistaken, we should still retain humility.  If we find it necessary (in other words, we shouldn't always be looking for opportunities, but should be willing) to rebuke a brother for sin, we must approach him with humility, respect, and tact.  

And...

Let us never forget that "Love covers a multitude of sins."  That truth is so important that the Bible says it twice!  Sometimes you just need to let stuff go!

So, my brethren, let us strive for that delicate balance.  Let our love be honest and our rebukes be humble.  Let us seek that organic, spirit-filled unity that members of a body ought to have.  Let us strike that harmony of graces that our Savior commended and demonstrated while He walked this Earth. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...

Anglicanism, Paedocommunion, & Being Reformed

I consider myself Reformed.  I was baptized as a baby in a PCA church.  I grew up in a Reformed microdenomination that allowed its member churches to subscribe to any of the Reformed confessions (we subscribed to the Three Forms of Unity).  In many ways, whether I like it or not, I still think and act like a Reformed Presbyterian.   Some, however, would seek to deny me that label.  I suspect there are many reasons for this, but paramount among them is that I hold to Paedocommunion (hereafter PC), which, for some reason, is absolutely the worst thing ever to these people.  Some would go so far as to say that PC makes me a heretic, but they all agree that I am certainly not Reformed .   My recent engagement with these opponents of PC has caused me to reflect on what it means to be Reformed and what it means to be a Christian.  This online jousting has dovetailed well with some of my recent study, particularly  An Apology of the Church...

Some Thoughts on the 2024 Election

So, we had an election earlier this week.  Perhaps you heard about it. I have done my best to remain mostly silent on political issues this time around because I have found that fixating on such matters does little for my mental or spiritual health.  Also, no one cares what I think.  Nevertheless, here are a few thoughts on our recent election. 1) I didn't vote for Donald Trump, but I'd be lying if I said I'm not glad he won.  To be clear, that says more about Kamala Harris than about Donald Trump. 2) This election seemed much cleaner--much less suspicious--than the sordid affair we had in 2020.  This election didn't feature any poll workers tallying (discovering? conjuring?) votes behind closed doors in the wee hours of the night, messy mail-in voting, or voter turnout beyond plausible expectations.  The 2020 election had me convinced that we would never see another peaceful, uncontested election, but, as contentious as things were this year, it seems like...