Skip to main content

Who are You to Judge the Servant of Another?

Balance, my brothers.  Balance.

I find that most theological or ethical conundrums are solvable if we find the balance between extremes.

The modern social landscape is pervaded by subjectivism and emotionalism.  

"Only God can judge me!" we cry.  

"Don't judge me!" we insist.

Unfortunately, this kind of thinking has infiltrated the Church and can be heard from pulpits around the world.  Pastors no longer make definitive declarations of right and wrong, nor are they allowed to say anything negative.  They're not supposed to tell people how to live their lives.  To speak of sin is taboo.  Christian brethren are no longer willing to exhort or to be exhorted.

"Different strokes for different folks!" rules the day.

This is, undoubtedly, an unbiblical mindset.  The idea that true love ignores behavior that is perilous to a brother's soul is patently false.  Christians, as the body of Christ and coworkers in the Gospel, are to be willing to talk about sin.  We should be courageous enough to warn our brother about sin and humble enough to be warned about our own.  The Bible tells us to confess our sins to each other and to bear one another's burdens, and it even gives us a strategy for presenting a brother with his sin.

But...balance.

The Bible also says, "Who are you to pass judgment on the servant of another?  It is before his own master that he stands or falls."

You should be willing to engage other people about their sin, but you are not Jesus.  You are not God.  You are a member of the body, but you are not the Head!  You do not possess the authority to judge the souls of your brethren!  It may be your job to warn and to edify, but it is not your calling to occupy the great white throne!  You, even if you are in a position of spiritual authority, are a brother, not a lord.  

You are not your brother's master!

Furthermore, you do not have the right to impose your preferences upon your brethren.  You have no right to hold people to a standard that you have unilaterally erected.  Many people who claim to confront sin in their brethren are merely confronting violations of their own arbitrary rules.  Like Pharisees they crucify anyone who oversteps their fences, all the while the weightier matters of the law are ignored.

Attitude is key here.

One's interaction with others should, no, must, always be defined by humility, and this is particularly important when exhortation is involved.  If a brother approaches us with sin, we must humbly embrace that rebuke.  Even if our brother is mistaken, we should still retain humility.  If we find it necessary (in other words, we shouldn't always be looking for opportunities, but should be willing) to rebuke a brother for sin, we must approach him with humility, respect, and tact.  

And...

Let us never forget that "Love covers a multitude of sins."  That truth is so important that the Bible says it twice!  Sometimes you just need to let stuff go!

So, my brethren, let us strive for that delicate balance.  Let our love be honest and our rebukes be humble.  Let us seek that organic, spirit-filled unity that members of a body ought to have.  Let us strike that harmony of graces that our Savior commended and demonstrated while He walked this Earth. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary