Skip to main content

The Remnant: Compromise and the Body of Christ

Liberalism.

Sexual immorality.

Hypocrisy.

Worldliness.

Unbelief.

Apostasy.

Compromise.

These crises are not novel, even among the communion of the saints.  The study of Church history--the honest study, at least--reveals many sordid chapters in the story of Christ's body.  The Church has always been imperfect.  She has always been a work in progress.  She has always had her ups and downs, her steps forwards and back, her moments of shame, or perhaps, her shamelessness.

What does this mean to the Christian?  Why should this motivate the Christian to study Church history?  Well, this reality should actually be encouraging.  As we witness the continual decline of the theological and moral standards of the Church, this checkered past should remind us that we have not passed a point of no return.  The sexual revolution has not conquered the Church.   God has not abandoned His plan for His elect.  Technology and Science, the twin deities of humanism, have not rendered faith and purity obsolete.  The declaration of our Savior--that the gates of hell will not prevail against His Church--has not been nullified!  God is not dead!

You see, my brothers and sisters, our God has always worked through a remnant.  In fact, one could accurately describe the Bible as the story of the remnant.  The Garden, the Exodus, the Conquest, the Captivity, the Return, the Twelve, the Persecution of the Church--all these remind us that nothing, not even meager numbers or lukewarm believers, can eradicate God's plan or God's people.  God will build.  God will purify.  The Holy Spirit is at work in the world!  Jesus Christ is the Author and Finisher of our Faith, the true Seed of the woman, the true Remnant!

Orthodox Christianity does not need to compromise to survive.  Faithful Christians do not need to abandon our moors to stay relevant.  On the contrary, our relevance will be established as we stand against the floods of corruption and the waves of compromise.  Our influence upon social institutions and upon the masses will come and go, but the Church will endure!  Worship Centers packed with itching ears was never the goal, nor the product, of the Gospel anyway!

So as we watch megachurchs and megadenominations, along with their leaders, grovel at the feet of liberalism, we must remind ourselves that it is okay, nay, it is a privilege, to be a part of the Remnant.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary