Skip to main content

Peace of Mind and the Upcoming Election

Last week I received (among the litany of junk mail that I normally get) a colorful advertisement inviting me to place the weight of my vote behind Mike DeWine and Jon Husted, Republican candidates for Governor and Lt. Governor, respectively, here in my home state of Ohio.  Now, while I'm a right-leaning independent, this post will not be discussing the merits of any particular candidate or party.  I'd like to explore why we vote the way we do.

As I perused the tri-fold flyer, three thoughts went through my head.  Firstly, I thought, "Is it really that time of year again?"  I'm beginning to think it's always that time of year!  Secondly, I couldn't help but to notice that the ad was printed on some incredibly-thick cardstock.  It was a really impressive piece of third-class mail!  The campaign donations must've been flowing in for Mr. DeWine this year.

Finally, I was struck by the audacity of the claim on the front of the ad.  The tagline, carefully crafted to compel my vote, was (and I quote), "The Road to Peace of Mind Starts Here."  Those words purport a campaign based on confidence, but they really demonstrate a campaign based on fear.

Fear.

What a powerful tool, no, weapon, fear is!  Fear is universal.  Fear is one of those absolutes that unite us as the human race.  Fear has been used in all cultures and eras for self-serving ends as aggressors have employed it to dominate their fellow men.  Leaders, both religious and civil, have relied upon fear to ensure the submission of those under them.  Fear is the key to oppression.

Everybody is afraid of something.  We're afraid of crime.  We're afraid of losing our families and our jobs.  We're afraid of bad weather and moral decline.  We're afraid of the unknown.  We're afraid that the way life is will someday no longer be the way life is.  We're afraid of living in fear.  We're afraid of death.

Fear is limitless.  Fear is king.  Fear is, for many people, god.

Politics are such a fertile breeding ground for fear because our civil leaders influence so much of our lives--our family life, religion, employment, entertainment, etc.  The more control they have, the more fear they wield.  It is no surprise, then, that fear has been a major part of American politics for the entirety of our existence as a nation.  Why should the 2018 election be any different?  What better way to win votes than to assuage fears?  It's an ancient strategy--convince constituents that there are reasons to fear the other candidate's regime, while you, on the other hand, are the answer to all their problems.
   
In one sense, fear is rational.  If you're walking down the street and see criminal activity occurring, it only makes sense to increase your pace.  It's practical to be concerned that your children will have a decent community in which to raise your grandchildren.

Fear is eminently useful.  Fear of a speeding ticket keeps me from going too fast on the road.  Fear of retribution constrains criminals, while fear of obesity convinces gluttons to put down that third donut (I've been there, bro).  Fear is one of many important human emotions and, for the atheist or the agnostic, fear is vital for self-preservation.  When the nonchristian casts his vote, fear is his best friend.

The Christian, however, has a unique relationship towards fear.  John tells us that perfect love casts out fear, but Solomon tells us that the fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom.  How can these two coexist?  Being a Christian doesn't necessarily mean that all fear is removed, but it does mean that our fear is redirected.  We fear for ours souls, not for our lives.  We fear displeasing our God, not losing our position as His children.  We fear straying from God's path, not the constraints thereof.

The Christian, then, should never vote out of fear.  We shouldn't be Christians at church and atheists at the polls!  I believe we should vote from principle and let God deal with the rest.  I can understand other perspectives, but, when people castigated me for refusing to vote for Donald Trump, it was clear that fear was their primary motivator.

The Christian's peace of mind should be a direct result of his belief and trust in God, not the circumstances of his life or society.  The knowledge that God is in control should dictate the decisions that we make.  Our faith is not perfect in this life, but as we grow in our faith and become more Christlike, we will rest in our Father more and more until we receive that transcendent peace that only He can provide.  This peace should pervade our lives, extending even to our political choices. 

Will I vote for Mike DeWine and Jon Husted?  I don't know--probably; but it will not be because doing so brings me peace of mind.  After all, no political campaign should bring the Christian peace of mind.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repe...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...