Skip to main content

A Few Thoughts about the Accusations Made against Judge Kavanaugh

I have been quietly observing this whole Kavanaugh situation, but now I thought I'd offer a few thoughts.  I guess I haven't been accused of sexism recently enough.  In case you are unaware, the confirmation of Trump's most recent nomination for the Supreme Court is not going as smoothly as he would have hoped.  Depending on your perspective, Brett Kavanaugh is either reaping that which he has sown or is enduring character assassination the like of which most citizens will never begin to understand.  Regardless, it is a depressing commentary on the state of politics in the United States of America.  Here's my take:

1) It's always suspicious when a woman "goes public" with an accusation of sexual assault only when a conservative politician is about to attain an important office.  Can we all agree to that?  We've seen this one so many times before that it's difficult to be anything but cynical.  It's hard for the casual bystander not to ask, "Why didn't she come forward sooner?"  And, yet...

2) Dealing with sexual assault is a complex issue and we should never let the many false accusations discount the valid accusations.  There are a million reasons why a woman wouldn't come forward: fear, her own sense of shame, the desire to avoid tearing apart his family, etc.  Perhaps she figured she was better off letting it go and not enduring tedious legal proceedings, but now feels that she is responsible to warn the world of the dark history of a man who may become one of the most powerful leaders in our nation.  Both 1) and 2) are equally possible, so how do we decide?  How can we be confident that justice is ever really served in a situation like this?  Which leads me to my next point...

3) Behold, the power of the the rumor!  Once a rumor is planted in the minds of the American public, it is nearly impossible to eradicate.  Many good people have been destroyed by baseless allegations, which is why it is so important to maintain a man's (or woman's, for that matter) innocence unless some form of evidence can substantiate allegations made against him.  The liberals have made a living by recognizing and exploiting our natural tendency to believe rumors.  Allegations cast doubt against otherwise irreproachable figures to the point that their own supporters and colleagues abandon them to avoid the possible political ramifications.  "But, what if it's true?" we all think.  Better safe than sorry, right?  Which is why...

4) False allegations need to be punished.  The government exists to protect the innocent.  If someone makes a false accusation, he/she should be punished.  Proving that allegations are false is complex and difficult, but if it can be done conclusively, and sometimes that is possible, the party bringing those accusations should be prosecuted.  And, yet...

5) Witnesses must not be intimidated or coerced.  Instead of vilifying victims, we must provide an environment that encourages the truth.  This is what is so tricky about sexual assault--there are typically no witnesses aside from the victim and the perpetrator.  It's the prototypical he-said/she-said ordeal, which means it's an inherently-difficult issue to prosecute properly.  Despite these issues our justice system ought to protect the innocent, regardless of which side of the accusation he/she might occupy.

6) Finally, let me just add that this, and similar situations, should act as a reminder to us all to avoid situations where false allegations could be made.  Placing ourselves in precarious situations invites victimization.  Let me be clear: the rape victim is not at fault, nor is the falsely-accused, but we live in a broken world and it serves us well to protect ourselves by avoiding ungodly situations.  Being harmed isn't a sin, but exercising discretion in how and with whom we spend our time can make our lives much easier.

So, did he do it?  Is she a liberal prop designed to discredit a good man?  We may never know.  What we will know very soon is whether or not this will destroy his career and send Trump look for another candidate.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Forgive Them"

“Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” Forgiveness is hard.  Forgiveness is really, really hard. It’s difficult to forgive others who have genuinely harmed or offended us.   It’s easy to say , “I forgive you,” but it’s extremely difficult to feel it–to make peace in our hearts with the injustices that others have perpetrated against us. It just doesn’t feel right.  Sin should be punished!  Wrongs should be righted!  Right?! It’s difficult to forgive others when they ask for it.  It’s even more difficult to forgive them when they haven’t asked for it–when they don’t even recognize what they’ve done to hurt us. As our Savior hung upon His Cross, He asked the Father to forgive those nearby–those who were unwittingly contributing to the greatest injustice in the history of the world. These thieves, soldiers, and standers-by had no idea what was happening.  They had no idea that the jealousy of the Jews had placed Christ on that Cross...

5 Reasons I Want my Wife to Start Wearing a Head Covering during Corporate Worship

    Of late, the issue of head coverings has come up in my circle.  Okay...my cousin and I have been discussing it, but the point is, the issue has been bouncing around my head for the past few days.  It is a topic that I have avoided for some time.  Every time I read through 1 Corinthians, I would tell myself, "We'll get around to that."  The reality is that I didn't want to be "that guy"...that guy who people view as a chauvinistic jerk who wants to make sure everyone--especially his wife--remembers that he's the head of his home.  I think I'm beginning to respect "that guy"--those men who have cared enough to stand for what they believe.     Let me be clear that I am referring to head coverings for women (those old enough to leave them on...)  DURING CORPORATE WORSHIP.  I am not advocating head coverings at all times.  Though I see nothing necessarily wrong that practice, I don't see any command for it either.   ...

Paedocommunion: Consistent Covenantalism or Anti-Confessionalism?

    Being raised as a paedocommunionist (that means our kids get to eat Jesus, too), I have always been amazed by how passionately credocommunionists (that means their kids don't get to eat Jesus until they articulate a "credible" profession of faith) dislike the practice.  I would think that they could look at paedocommunion and at least respect it as an attempt to live out Covenant Theology in a consistent way.  Instead, paedocommunionists have been widely viewed as being on the fringe of the fringe (yes, that far) of Reformed Theology.  I like to think that I have been able to agree-to-disagree in an amicable way with my credocommunionist friends.  However, I will admit that being discounted as "unconfessional" (trust me, I've been called worse) has made many paedocommunionists (you'd have to ask my friends whether or not that applies to me) act in a manner that lacks Christian grace.     So, the question remains, is paedocommunion a view hel...