Skip to main content

A Few Thoughts about the Accusations Made against Judge Kavanaugh

I have been quietly observing this whole Kavanaugh situation, but now I thought I'd offer a few thoughts.  I guess I haven't been accused of sexism recently enough.  In case you are unaware, the confirmation of Trump's most recent nomination for the Supreme Court is not going as smoothly as he would have hoped.  Depending on your perspective, Brett Kavanaugh is either reaping that which he has sown or is enduring character assassination the like of which most citizens will never begin to understand.  Regardless, it is a depressing commentary on the state of politics in the United States of America.  Here's my take:

1) It's always suspicious when a woman "goes public" with an accusation of sexual assault only when a conservative politician is about to attain an important office.  Can we all agree to that?  We've seen this one so many times before that it's difficult to be anything but cynical.  It's hard for the casual bystander not to ask, "Why didn't she come forward sooner?"  And, yet...

2) Dealing with sexual assault is a complex issue and we should never let the many false accusations discount the valid accusations.  There are a million reasons why a woman wouldn't come forward: fear, her own sense of shame, the desire to avoid tearing apart his family, etc.  Perhaps she figured she was better off letting it go and not enduring tedious legal proceedings, but now feels that she is responsible to warn the world of the dark history of a man who may become one of the most powerful leaders in our nation.  Both 1) and 2) are equally possible, so how do we decide?  How can we be confident that justice is ever really served in a situation like this?  Which leads me to my next point...

3) Behold, the power of the the rumor!  Once a rumor is planted in the minds of the American public, it is nearly impossible to eradicate.  Many good people have been destroyed by baseless allegations, which is why it is so important to maintain a man's (or woman's, for that matter) innocence unless some form of evidence can substantiate allegations made against him.  The liberals have made a living by recognizing and exploiting our natural tendency to believe rumors.  Allegations cast doubt against otherwise irreproachable figures to the point that their own supporters and colleagues abandon them to avoid the possible political ramifications.  "But, what if it's true?" we all think.  Better safe than sorry, right?  Which is why...

4) False allegations need to be punished.  The government exists to protect the innocent.  If someone makes a false accusation, he/she should be punished.  Proving that allegations are false is complex and difficult, but if it can be done conclusively, and sometimes that is possible, the party bringing those accusations should be prosecuted.  And, yet...

5) Witnesses must not be intimidated or coerced.  Instead of vilifying victims, we must provide an environment that encourages the truth.  This is what is so tricky about sexual assault--there are typically no witnesses aside from the victim and the perpetrator.  It's the prototypical he-said/she-said ordeal, which means it's an inherently-difficult issue to prosecute properly.  Despite these issues our justice system ought to protect the innocent, regardless of which side of the accusation he/she might occupy.

6) Finally, let me just add that this, and similar situations, should act as a reminder to us all to avoid situations where false allegations could be made.  Placing ourselves in precarious situations invites victimization.  Let me be clear: the rape victim is not at fault, nor is the falsely-accused, but we live in a broken world and it serves us well to protect ourselves by avoiding ungodly situations.  Being harmed isn't a sin, but exercising discretion in how and with whom we spend our time can make our lives much easier.

So, did he do it?  Is she a liberal prop designed to discredit a good man?  We may never know.  What we will know very soon is whether or not this will destroy his career and send Trump look for another candidate.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Forgive Them"

“Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” Forgiveness is hard.  Forgiveness is really, really hard. It’s difficult to forgive others who have genuinely harmed or offended us.   It’s easy to say , “I forgive you,” but it’s extremely difficult to feel it–to make peace in our hearts with the injustices that others have perpetrated against us. It just doesn’t feel right.  Sin should be punished!  Wrongs should be righted!  Right?! It’s difficult to forgive others when they ask for it.  It’s even more difficult to forgive them when they haven’t asked for it–when they don’t even recognize what they’ve done to hurt us. As our Savior hung upon His Cross, He asked the Father to forgive those nearby–those who were unwittingly contributing to the greatest injustice in the history of the world. These thieves, soldiers, and standers-by had no idea what was happening.  They had no idea that the jealousy of the Jews had placed Christ on that Cross...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...

"The More Things Change..." or "Joe Biden Doing Joe Biden Things"

1 Samuel 2  relates the story of Eli, the well-meaning high priest whose only flaw (apparently) was his refusal to discipline his sons.  These sons, described as worthless men , utilized their position to abuse the people and indulge their lusts with impunity.  Eli's dereliction of duty brought his otherwise noble career in service to God's house to an ignominious end.   There are, of course, important differences between Eli and Joe Biden.  Joe Biden is not a religious leader (though he is a practicing Roman Catholic ), nor would I consider his record to be otherwise spotless.  However, similarly to Eli,  Biden's pardoning of his own  worthless son, Hunter, will prove to be his legacy.  His long (and I mean loooong) career in politics will likely be overshadowed, even in the eyes of those who previously respected him, by this one shameless act.  By pardoning his son despite  promising not to, Biden has yet again demonstrate...