Skip to main content

Rape is Not a Political Issue

Warning!  This is another rant, which means you can expect conversational sentence structure, sarcasm, and my opinions.  Here it goes!

We Americans are something, aren't we?

Or maybe the entire world is messed up.  Yeah, it's probably that.

Anyway, we Americans have the knack of taking any issue and making it political.  Example: abortion.  Killing unborn human children in the womb.  Appalling, right?  Beyond even consideration in a civilized culture that takes human rights seriously, right?  Right?!  Nope.  We have to debate it because I'm a Republican and you're a Democrat.  It's a political issue.  That means we have to come to a bipartisan answer that suits everyone, including people who tear fetuses limb from limb in the womb.

We Americans suck, don't we?

Well, here we go again, making a moral issue into a political one.  We have managed to make rape a political issue.  Your guy should resign because he did [fill in the blank], but my guy should stay in office because he's innocent, sorry, or so old that it doesn't really matter.  The next time you hear someone accused of rape, think deeply about how you instinctually react.  Is your reaction politically motivated or informed?  What is your gut telling you?

Mt thesis today is simple.  Rape is not a political issue.  It is a moral issue.  All issues, of course, are moral to some extent, but some issues are moral to the exclusion of being political.  Rape is one such issue.  As such, we as a nation should be uniformly opposed to it.  If a woman is sexually assaulted, we should all be outraged, regardless of what part of the country the accused calls home or what letter is beside his name on the ballot.

To maintain balance, however, we must remember that justice is not a political issue either.  Justice also transcends politics.  It's transpolitical, if you will.  We can debate over the best way to do run a government, but we should have complete agreement when it comes to the fundamental rules of justice.  A man (or woman) should never be presumed guilty based merely on allegations.  Without proof there must be no conviction, whether the perpetrator was accused of murder, rape, or stealing a Yoo-Hoo from his local convenience store.

Rape is a unique crime.  I get that.  It is often difficult to prove because it, like most heinous crimes, is usually done where no one is around to see it.  Rape also leaves the victim in a fragile state, which complicates a trial.  Despite these realities, we simply cannot abandon such a fundamental rule of justice, even for such a sensitive crime.  Doing so opens the door to untold opportunity for corruption.

"But people will get away with rape!" you cry.

People get away with bad things all the time.  It sucks, but it's part of living in a depraved world.

Remember the old saying about two wrongs not making a right?  Yeah, that applies her.

I would rather see 10 guilty men go free than one innocent man be punished wrongly.  We're so used to convictions based on circumstantial evidence that we've totally lost sight of what really constitutes proof of guilt.  We so badly want someone...anyone...to pay for crimes that we're willing to risk false convictions for the sake of closure.  This is just one of the many problems with our justice system.

Those of us who believe in God, however, don't need every single crime to be solved.  We know that God will punish those criminals who get away with crimes here on Earth.  At the end of it all, no one really gets away with rape.  Or murder.  Or petty theft.  Men aren't omniscient, but they don't need to be.  God will make sure justice is served.

So, basically what I'm trying to say is, if we could stop politicizing rape, that would be good.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Father, Forgive Them"

“Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” Forgiveness is hard.  Forgiveness is really, really hard. It’s difficult to forgive others who have genuinely harmed or offended us.   It’s easy to say , “I forgive you,” but it’s extremely difficult to feel it–to make peace in our hearts with the injustices that others have perpetrated against us. It just doesn’t feel right.  Sin should be punished!  Wrongs should be righted!  Right?! It’s difficult to forgive others when they ask for it.  It’s even more difficult to forgive them when they haven’t asked for it–when they don’t even recognize what they’ve done to hurt us. As our Savior hung upon His Cross, He asked the Father to forgive those nearby–those who were unwittingly contributing to the greatest injustice in the history of the world. These thieves, soldiers, and standers-by had no idea what was happening.  They had no idea that the jealousy of the Jews had placed Christ on that Cross...

5 Reasons I Want my Wife to Start Wearing a Head Covering during Corporate Worship

    Of late, the issue of head coverings has come up in my circle.  Okay...my cousin and I have been discussing it, but the point is, the issue has been bouncing around my head for the past few days.  It is a topic that I have avoided for some time.  Every time I read through 1 Corinthians, I would tell myself, "We'll get around to that."  The reality is that I didn't want to be "that guy"...that guy who people view as a chauvinistic jerk who wants to make sure everyone--especially his wife--remembers that he's the head of his home.  I think I'm beginning to respect "that guy"--those men who have cared enough to stand for what they believe.     Let me be clear that I am referring to head coverings for women (those old enough to leave them on...)  DURING CORPORATE WORSHIP.  I am not advocating head coverings at all times.  Though I see nothing necessarily wrong that practice, I don't see any command for it either.   ...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...