Skip to main content

Gorillas and Public Education

    Who knew a gorilla could cause this much outrage?  The Harambe situation has caused an alarming amount of debate and outrage.  It has been blogged about ad nauseam over the last few days, which is why I was reluctant to comment on it myself.  After all, what can I contribute to the discussion?  I am no expert, either at parenting or zoo-keeping (which are often quite similar, I might add).  I actually haven't even watched the video (intentionally), but it seems to me that there are essentially two debates being had.  The first is whether or not the parents were negligent.  I have no opinion.  As I said, I didn't see the video.  The second debate, and the one I'd like to address, is about the value of the lives of gorillas versus the lives of children.  The former has been an emotional, temporal debate.  The latter is philosophical and ideological.

    As I said, this debate is alarming.  Are we really debating the value of human life versus animal life (even endangered)?  When we're doing that, we've already lost.  Then again, we debate the morality of murdering unborn children, so I guess it makes sense.  How have we gotten this far?  As with our culture of violence and disrespect, this issue stems from our abandonment of God's Word.  More than that, we have abandoned religion altogether.  Religion, you see, is the only thing that gives us a reason to differentiate between man and beast (not all religions do this, of course).  Religion does this by attributing the existence of man to a special creative act of God.  Christianity (along with Judaism) specifically teaches that God made man in His own image.  If you abandon religion, especially Christianity and other religions within that tradition, you lose these types of societal moors. Naturalism simply offers no moral reason for why we should value human life more than animal life. In fact, it can offer no moral reason for anything at all.

    This has all been discussed though.  I'm sure a simple Google search would find a dozen blogs telling you the same thing.  I would like to turn my focus to the one side of the debate that I have personally not seen discussed--public education.  This Naturalistic worldview that pervades our culture is no accident.  It has been an intentional degradation of Christianity (and religion in general). This has been done primarily through government education.  The rejection of the Bible by the public education system in America was a sign of the rejection not just of a book, but of the worldview that book sets forth.  Naturalism was (and is) subverting Theism.  The teaching of Evolution has played a particularly large role in this gradual worldview change.  It is the alternative.  If man was not created by God, he must have come from somewhere. Evolution gives us a seemingly-plausible explanation for our existence, but it leaves us without moral responsibility.  It leaves us without any qualitative difference between man and our evolutionary ancestors.  We are different because we have evolved more.  That is all.  We do not have a Creator.  We do not have eternal souls.  We are simply self-realized animals.  This type of teaching has been consistently administered to the minds of America's children for nearly a century.

    Now, not all people will be as extreme or, shall I say, consistent, in applying their worldview. Many Naturalists would support the decision to save the child at the expense of the gorilla's life.  However, they could offer no logical reason for such support.  This, we might say, is a result of common grace. More disconcerting, however, are those on the other side of the aisle, those Christians who are unaware of their Naturalism.  They claim to believe in God and the Bible, but see no issue with submitting their children to an education system that denies Him, replacing Him with blind biological processes.  You may baptize Evolution with various theories that allow for the special creation of man, but that does not negate the 6 or 7 hours a day that your children spend immersed in Naturalism. Evolution is just one part of a worldview that sees the Creator of the Universe as unnecessary to the pursuit of knowledge.

    Christians must educate their children in a way that acknowledges and submits to God's Lordship over His Creation.  Science, along with Math, History, and Language Studies, etc. must be understood through the eye of God's character and revelation.  Such an education would teach that nature is to be respected and used appropriately, while not being worshiped or unduly revered.  If we hope to restore to this country a respect for life and a sense of moral responsibility, we must begin with the education system.  Realistically, this means seeking alternatives to public (government-run) education. Education must be prioritized.  We must do whatever it takes to give our children an education, at home or abroad, that instills a worldview that acknowledges our Creator and our proper place in His Creation.  

   





 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...

Anglicanism, Paedocommunion, & Being Reformed

I consider myself Reformed.  I was baptized as a baby in a PCA church.  I grew up in a Reformed microdenomination that allowed its member churches to subscribe to any of the Reformed confessions (we subscribed to the Three Forms of Unity).  In many ways, whether I like it or not, I still think and act like a Reformed Presbyterian.   Some, however, would seek to deny me that label.  I suspect there are many reasons for this, but paramount among them is that I hold to Paedocommunion (hereafter PC), which, for some reason, is absolutely the worst thing ever to these people.  Some would go so far as to say that PC makes me a heretic, but they all agree that I am certainly not Reformed .   My recent engagement with these opponents of PC has caused me to reflect on what it means to be Reformed and what it means to be a Christian.  This online jousting has dovetailed well with some of my recent study, particularly  An Apology of the Church...

Some Thoughts on the 2024 Election

So, we had an election earlier this week.  Perhaps you heard about it. I have done my best to remain mostly silent on political issues this time around because I have found that fixating on such matters does little for my mental or spiritual health.  Also, no one cares what I think.  Nevertheless, here are a few thoughts on our recent election. 1) I didn't vote for Donald Trump, but I'd be lying if I said I'm not glad he won.  To be clear, that says more about Kamala Harris than about Donald Trump. 2) This election seemed much cleaner--much less suspicious--than the sordid affair we had in 2020.  This election didn't feature any poll workers tallying (discovering? conjuring?) votes behind closed doors in the wee hours of the night, messy mail-in voting, or voter turnout beyond plausible expectations.  The 2020 election had me convinced that we would never see another peaceful, uncontested election, but, as contentious as things were this year, it seems like...