Skip to main content

The Church and the Political Aisle

    We conservative Christians are pretty darned predictable, politically speaking.  In some ways that is good.  It means we're consistent.  We stand for the truth.  Regardless of the social climate of the day, we maintain our values and standards.  Our socio-political moorings are sure.  Right?

    Unfortunately that's not always the case with American Christians.  Instead of consistently aligning our political viewpoints with the Word of God, we consistently follow what Fox News tells us.  We are pawns of the Republican party.  We reinforce conservative stereotypes with alarming regularity. Anytime someone shares an opinion that is remotely liberal, we're ready to debate, boycott, or protest it, without even considering its merits. Anything we hear or read on the news is automatically filtered through a liberal/conservative filter.  Someone died?  That must mean liberals are wrong--especially if that person happened to be black. Then liberals are extra wrong.  The guy was probably gay, too.  He deserved to be shot from behind because he was wearing a black hoodie after 7 P.M.

    Now, I consider myself a conservative Christian, both theologically and politically.  I believe that homosexuality, abortion, and race-baiting are wrong.  I believe that men dressed as women should not be allowed to use the women's restroom.  What bothers me, however, is how conservatives instinctively jump to the Republican side of the aisle.  Here's an example.  The movie Zootopia was recently being discussed in a Facebook group of which I am a member.  Some parents were recommending it, while others were expressing their disdain for the social messages latent throughout the film.  For any adult watching, race and gender issues were obvious throughout the film (other issues, like the LGBT crowd, may have been in view as well, though race and gender seemed paramount to me).  The merits of that particular movie aside, what struck me is how instantly we react to anything that has shades of liberalism.  Many people involved in the discussion expressed that they would never let their kids watch that sort of movie.  Another cinematic example would be the backlash from Star Wars' casting of female and black lead characters.  Now, even I'm annoyed at how far liberals go to try and make a point, but shouldn't our reaction tell us something about ourselves?  They cast those characters because they think that we're backwards bigots.  Don't we prove them right by having an issue with a movie that has a female lead?  Is a black James Bond repulsive to you?  You're either a purist or a racist.  I'll let you figure out which.

    The reality is that racism is real and it is wrong, as is sexism and murder and hateful speech and so on and so forth.  We as Christians need to stand against these wrongs, despite the woes of liberalism. When people do bad things, but happen to be conservatives, we need to hold them accountable. Sexual assault is a sin and a crime, even (or especially) when conservatives commit it.  We accuse the liberal media of being biased in their presentation of the facts, but we do the same thing.  The fact that Donald Trump, an immoral, racist womanizer, has consistently won conservative states just how bad the problem is!

    I'm not suggesting that we abandon conservative values, nor am I suggesting that we jump to the other side of the aisle.  I'm suggesting that we ignore the aisle altogether.  Let's get rid of the aisle! Christians should have a political outlook that differs from everyone else, even the libertarians.  You see, if we are to adhere to a truly Christian political platform, there is no way that we can align ourselves entirely with one party.  No current major political party in America represents true Christianity.  We need to have the Christian view of any issue, not the Republican view.  We need to react to news stories as Christians, not as Republicans.  Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity should not decide our political views for us, nor should the elite aristocracy of the Republican party.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...

Anglicanism, Paedocommunion, & Being Reformed

I consider myself Reformed.  I was baptized as a baby in a PCA church.  I grew up in a Reformed microdenomination that allowed its member churches to subscribe to any of the Reformed confessions (we subscribed to the Three Forms of Unity).  In many ways, whether I like it or not, I still think and act like a Reformed Presbyterian.   Some, however, would seek to deny me that label.  I suspect there are many reasons for this, but paramount among them is that I hold to Paedocommunion (hereafter PC), which, for some reason, is absolutely the worst thing ever to these people.  Some would go so far as to say that PC makes me a heretic, but they all agree that I am certainly not Reformed .   My recent engagement with these opponents of PC has caused me to reflect on what it means to be Reformed and what it means to be a Christian.  This online jousting has dovetailed well with some of my recent study, particularly  An Apology of the Church...