Skip to main content

How Christ Affects the Family--Notes from a Sermon from Colossians 3:18-4:1

I.                  Introduction
a.     Chapter 3
                                                             i.      In Chapter 3, Paul has been describing for us a heavenly-minded lifestyle.
                                                          ii.      He tells us what bad attitudes and actions we need to get rid of.
                                                       iii.      He tells what good attitudes and actions with which need to replace the bad ones.
b.    Having summarized the duty of all Christians, Paul now begins to address different groups of people within the body.  He specifically deals with how we relate to one another as Christians.  This is how we show that Christ has changed our lives.  Brian Bill: “The true test of our relationship with Christ is how we relate to others.  Or to say it another way, the home is the first place we test our newness in Christ as ‘God’s chosen people, holy and dearly loved.’ Jesus is referred to as ‘Lord’ or ‘Master’ seven times in these verses because His lordship finds conclusive expression in the day-to-day, routine relationships of life.”  MH: “We are really doing our duty to God when we are faithful in our duty to men.” 
c.     We will see strong parallels to Ephesians 5.
II.               Verse 18: The duty of wives to their husbands
a.     This is probably the most controversial topic right now (besides maybe homosexuality).  A belief in God’s structure of the home is becoming increasingly unpopular, but that doesn’t make it any less true.
b.    Not only society, but even people in the Church reject this.  They are quick to point out that Paul commands mutual submission of all Christians in Ephesians 5.  This is true.  We are all to submit to one another in Christ, but that doesn’t remove the special duty of the wife to submit to her husband.
c.     What?  Paul commands the wives to submit to their husbands.  Submit=to obey; to subject; to place or rank under.  This is the same word in Romans 13:1.  It was originally a military word showing the order of command.  Note: this is not a command for women to submit to men.  This is wives to their husbands in the structure of the home. 
d.    Why?  It is fitting in the Lord.  Fitting=due or proper.  It’s the will of God.  It’s the order God has established for the home.  It’s the way God has designed things to work.
e.     Paul gives us a couple of other reasons in other passages.         
                                                             i.      Ephesians 5:23: The husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the Church.
                                                          ii.      1 Corinthians 11:8-9: Man was created first and woman was created as a helpmeet for man.
                                                       iii.      1 Timothy 2:13-14: Eve sinned first.
III.           Verse 19: The duty of  husbands to their wives
a.     So, that’s where it stops, right?   Many sermons end there.
b.    What?  Husbands must love their wives.  Love=agape, which is self-sacrificing love based on commitment.  John Gill: “[This love] consists in a strong and cordial affection for them; in a real delight and pleasure in them; in seeking their contentment, satisfaction, and pleasure; in a quiet, constant, and comfortable dwelling with them; in a providing all things necessary for them; in a protecting them from all injuries and abuses; in concealing their faults, and covering their infirmities; in entertaining the best opinion of their persons and actions; and in endeavouring to promote their spiritual good and welfare.”  That’s quite a responsibility!
c.     Why?  Paul doesn’t give a reason here, but he does give reasons in  Ephesians 5:25-33.     
1.    We are one with our wives.  By loving them, we love ourselves.  It’s common sense.
2.    We are called to sanctify our wives.
3.    Marriage is a microcosm of Christ and the Church.  Marriage was designed to picture how Christ loves His Church.  We must love our wives in the same self-sacrificing way that Christ loved us.  Whom does Paul give the heavier responsibility here?
d.    Paul adds a warning.  He says, “Do not be harsh with them.”  Harsh=bitter.  Some commentators say Paul is warning us not to make our wives bitter, while others think Paul is telling husbands not to become bitter with their wives.  I agree with the former (parallel seen in next verse).  When husbands exercise their authority poorly, wives become bitter, and the marriage becomes a struggle for all parties involved. 
e.     Some women balk at the idea of obeying their husbands.  This is partly because of the way marriage has been perverted and abused.  Marriage was never intended to be one party ordering around the other party.  AB: “Where commands begin in this relation, happiness usually ends; and the moment a husband requires a wife to do anything, it is usually a signal of departing or departed affection and peace.  When there are proper feelings in both parties in this relation, there will be no occasion either to command or to obey.  There should be such mutual love and confidence, that the known wish of the husband should be a law to the wife; and that the known desires of the wife should be the rule which he would approve.”
IV.           Verse 20: The duty of children to their parents
a.     This is only slightly more popular than Paul’s command to wives.
b.    What?  Children to obey their parents.
c.     To what extent?  In everything.  Now, this does not, of course, mean that children are supposed to do something wrong if their parents tell them to.  Even children have the responsibility to obey God rather than man, even their parents.  However, this means that the jurisdiction of the parents covers every area of that child’s life.  Children should obey their parents even in the areas that are not explicitly right or wrong.  “Because I said so” is Biblical, to a certain extent.  
d.    Why?  This is the simplest why.  It pleases the Lord.  In Ephesians 6:1-3, Paul adds that this is the first command with a promise—long life. 
e.     In our modern day we do not take this command seriously, but this sin is placed in the same category as many heinous sins.  Romans 1:29-31; 2 Timothy 3:2-5.  Disobedience to parents is a dangerous sin, and one that God hates. 
f.      While children’s relationships to their parents change as they get older, there is a sense in which this is a lifelong command.  We should always respect and honor our parents.  We should always seek their advice.  Even more than that, though, we ought to seek to please them and to honor their legacy. 
V.              Verse 21: The manner in which a father exercises authority
a.     Fathers are not to provoke their children.  Provoke=stir up.  This applies as equally to mothers, but is especially necessary for fathers to hear.  Fathers must not be overbearing.  They must not nit-pick.  They must not be physically abusive.  They must not mock them or demean them.  They must not expect more from them than children are capable of giving and being.  They must not neglect or ignore their children.
b.    Why?  They will become discouraged.  Discouraged=lose heart.  When parents make it hard to obey their commands, children can become resentful.  When parents are never satisfied with what their children do, those children often cease any attempts to please them.  When parents are inconsistent and discipline out of anger instead of love, children lose respect for their parents.  When parents ignore and neglect their children, they simply lose the hearts of their children.  So, while children are to obey in everything, parents are to exercise that authority responsibly. 
c.     Parents must not make it difficult for their children to obey.  Ideally, the parents would have the love and trust of their children to such a degree that the children would sincerely follow and obey their parents because they honestly believe that their parents know and want what is best for them.
VI.           Verses 22-25: The duty of slaves to their masters
a.     Slaves were a part of the home.
b.    This was incredibly applicable to the people in Paul’s day.  Nearly 50% of the people in the Roman Empire were slaves.  There were probably slaves and masters in this very congregation.  In fact, churches were one of the only places where one might find slaves and masters gathering together.
c.     This section is still very applicable in the 21st century.
                                                             i.      Slavery is not dead.  It is still rampant in many areas of the world.
                                                          ii.      Those of us who live in countries where slavery is banned can still glean principles of following authority.
                                                       iii.      We can learn invaluable principles for how employers and employees ought to interact. 
d.    What?  Paul commands slaves/servants (those in involuntary servitude) to obey their masters.  The Gospel was not giving an excuse to rebel. 
e.     To what extent?  In everything.
f.      How?  Sincerely, and not as people-pleasers.  They were to be as diligent when their boss was absent as when he was there.  
g.     Why?
                                                             i.      Fear of the Lord
                                                          ii.      We really work for Jesus.  All that we do is to be for His glory.
                                                       iii.      Ultimately, God will judge.
1.    An inheritance awaits the faithful; condemnation awaits the unfaithful.
2.    There is no partiality.  A master will not receive any leniency because of his position, nor will a slave receive leniency because of his position.
VII.       Verse 1: The duty of masters to their slaves
a.     What?  Masters must treat their slaves justly and fairly.  Literally, they are to provide them with equity and justice.   
b.    Why?  Everybody has a Master, even the master.  “Lord” is a bit of a confusing translation since we associate that with the name of God or with Christ as King.  Lord meant master.  Jesus is our boss.  He is our owner.  He directs our lives.  This should be comforting and scary. 
VIII.    Concluding thoughts
a.     God cares about the little guy.  Paul cares about for children, women, and slaves.  This was revolutionary.
b.    Our equality in Christ does not mean that we have the same function.  We are all as equally valuable to God.  We are all as equally saved in God’s eyes.  Nonetheless, different people have different callings and functions within the Family, Church, and State.
c.     In order for there to be unity and peace, particularly in the family, everyone needs to be on the same page and take care of their own business.  When one member of the family rejects the structure God has ordained for the home, the family begins to fall apart.  The wife must submit.  The husband and father must love and nurture.  Children must obey.  When one of these pieces is missing, the entire puzzle falls apart.  Abuses occur.  Hearts become bitter.  The goal of marriage is lost.

d.    Authority is serious and can be very dangerous when it is misused.  This is true of anyone in a position of authority, but especially true of husbands and fathers.  We must be constantly on guard against the temptation to abuse our authority.  The authority we have has been given by God and is based upon the responsibilities they have to love, to nurture, to sanctify, and to provide for our families.  We have a perfect role model—Jesus.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, let me clarify what I mean when

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repent and be baptized...&quo

Why do you go to church on Sunday?

Why do you go to church on Sunday?  I would assume there are many reasons, but what is the primary reason that you get up on a cold, snowy Sunday morning and get your butt to church?  Further, why has the Church of Jesus Christ consistently gathered together on Sundays (among other days) for the last 2000 years? Throughout my 34 years of church attendance I would have proffered a variety of answers to that question.  As a child I'm sure I went to church because I had to, to see my cousins (who happened to be my best friends), to get bread and wine (weekly communion for the win), etc.  As my faith matured in adulthood these reasons remained, hopefully deepening, but to them were added concepts like rest and theological training. As I moved into Anglicanism I was struck by the deliberate focus on worship .  Why do Christians gather on Sunday morning?  To worship God!  Are teaching and fellowship important?  Absolutely!  Are they aspects of worship?  Certainly!  Is either the primary