Skip to main content

Father's Day

    This will be my second Father's Day as a father.  I have learned much about life over the past 15 months, but  I'm still quite wet behind the ears, if you will.  I thought it would be interesting to take a second to think about what it means to be a father.

    Firstly, I would like to say thank you to my father and to all the father figures that God has placed in my life.  All these men have shown me a thing or two about life, even if they didn't realize it, by their triumphs and defeats in life.  I've found that one of the best ways to grow up/learn stuff is just to watch people.
Analytic observation of real people in the real world is one of the greatest tools for growth.

    Secondly, what does it mean to be a father?  That is a deep question.  Being a father, I suppose, combines bread-winning, spiritual guidance, mentoring, and many other things.  Ultimately, however, fatherhood is a metaphor.  Underneath the physical, relational aspect of father, the role of a father is revelatory.  As I interact with my child (soon to be children, Lord willing), I am supposed to be showing her  who God is (the same is true for mothers, but it's not Mother's Day, so...).  That idea hit me today.  It's a heavy thought.  It's a scary thought.  God is perfectly patient, loving, just, faithful, etc.  I am not perfectly any of those things, but even so, I can show my children a shadow of what our Heavenly Father is like.  I should be striving to do my very best to represent Him accurately.

    At the end of the day, I should be showing my children who their Father really is.  I have been entrusted with the physical, spiritual, emotional, mental, and academic development of a little girl named Genesis.  I do not own her though.  She belongs to God.  I need to show her that she and I share the same God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.

    So, happy Father's Day to all you Dad's out there.  It's a high calling, is it not?

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

4 Reasons I Affirm Paedocommunion

If you have interacted with me on social media, you know that I have always been outspoken on the issue of Paedocommunion .  It is a theological position and a liturgical practice about which I am passionate.  Having been raised, and having raised my children, at the Table, I cannot imagine attending a church that didn't allow PC.  I hope that when I am old and gray, I will still be an advocate for bringing little children to the Sacrament. Throughout the 12 years that I have had this blog, I have written scattered thoughts on the topic, but it appears that I have never written a concise summary of my reasons for affirming PC.  I was thoroughly convinced that I had, but I can't seem to locate it, so I guess I never did.  So, to rectify the omission, here are four reasons I hold to PC. 1) Paedocommunion is Biblical.   Any discussion of the topic should start here, and I would hope that both sides of the debate would make this assertion.  However, l...
Post a Comment
Read more

1 Corinthians, the Covenant Hermeneutic, & Paedocommunion

As an adherent to Paedocommunion  (hereafter PC), I have always found it painfully ironic that Credocommunionists use 1 Corinthians 11 to withhold children (among others) from the Table.  One can imagine St. Paul shaking his head as he watches theologians using his discussion of unity at the Table to divide the body at the Table.  You're missing the point! he would say in exasperation.  Not only does 1 Corinthians 11 not forbid PC; I would go so far as to say that there is no better defense of PC in the New Testament than the epistle of 1 Corinthians. Credocommunionist logic is pretty straightforward.  1 Corinthians 11:28 says, "Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup."  If, they argue, one is unable to fulfill the exhortation to examine himself, then he may not eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  This is a pretty logical deduction, right? Credobaptists would adamantly agree.  Acts 2:38 says, "Repe...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Real Presence & Paedocommunion: A Deeper Rift Between Reformed Churches

You're going back to Rome! Theological disagreements within the Reformed world, especially those of the last half century, often devolve into these sorts of accusations.  As controversialists like Doug Wilson and Peter Leithart began to break away from the larger conservative Presbyterian and Reformed denominations, it became clear that the rift was deeper than semantics and systematic minutiae.  Much like the Reformation four centuries before, the Table was a primary point of conflict.   What does it mean?  Who may partake?  What do we call it?    These questions, along with a few more, divided Reformed brethren as the physical elements of our religion reflected deeper conflicts.  Good men began to understand that the problem wasn't just in our logos, but in our pathos and ethos, as well. Paedocommunion (hereafter PC) has been one of the hottest points of contention.  PC has always been normal to me as I grew up with it.  I underst...
Post a Comment
Read more